Wednesday, 23 August 2017

I am an historian, King Harold was a Dacian, and the Carmen of 1066 is re-published!

In 2015 I took the momentous decision to abandon a 30 year career in banking infrastructure and dedicate myself full-time to history.  I got tired of being told I wasn't qualified to translate the Carmen or re-interpret 1066 history because I wasn't a Latinist and I wasn't an historian.  I enrolled in the taught masters programme in Medieval History at King's College London.  It was brutal.  I let myself be placed in the Intermediate Latin class instead of the Beginner class.  I also took a year long seminar in Latin Literature which required massive amounts of weekly translation and original manuscript transcription, translation and collaborative critical editing of an unpublished Latin text.  Both Latin courses were taught by Dr Daniel Hadas, whose enthusiasm for all things ancient kept me going when I felt overwhelmed.  Despite my fears I got my highest exam marks in Latin and received my MA in January 2017 with merit.

Dr Hadas also generously agreed to edit my translation of the Carmen at a rate of 25 lines per week, an effort that occupied us for almost the entire academic year.  The result is a massively improved translation of the Carmen, which is republished and available from Amazon globally as of yesterday.  If the Latin is not perfect, it is grammatically and metrically defensible, and the English translation is far more literal than either the Merton & Muntz or the Frank Barlow editions.

A lot has changed in the new edition otherwise too.  It is presented as facing pages of Latin text and English translation for easier reading and referencing.  There are appendices on Imperium in England to 966, Imperium in England 966 to 1066, the New Geography of the Norman Conquest, and jurisdictions of the church, crown and ports.  Everything I have studied and learned and researched for two years has been used to make this a much better book and it is now more than 300 pages long.  Buy it now on Amazon or click the link to the right and get a signed copy.

One thing that didn't change is my conviction that the Norman fleet landed in the Brede Basin, camped at Icklesham, and fought the battle somewhere on the cape of Hastingas to the east of the Great Ridge.  There is now much more analysis of why this geograhy makes logistical, geomorphic and military good sense.  Hopefully there will be an effort to explore the basin using the tools of modern archaeology which will unearth its Norman, Dacian and Roman past.

Dacian?  Yeah, well it turns out that the Vikings were Greeks.  They were Bronze Age sea-armies from the Black Sea that had settled the coasts of Britannia and Gaul to secure the supply of British tin which they could turn into bronze weapons and brass fittings for ships.  There was no other plentiful source of tin in Europe 3500 years ago, and it can't be coincidence that there is DNA showing eradication of indigenous English males beginning 3500 years ago at the start of the age of settled agriculture and fabrication of bronze tools and weapons.  Bronze is 98 per cent copper and 2 per cent tin.  British tin has been found everywhere the sea-armies settled, from the tombs of mummies in Egypt, to the trade goods of merchants in Tyre, to the battle shields of warriors up the Danube.  All of them had Near East DNA and British tin.

And the pattern holds throughout Europe.  80 per cent of Europeans have DNA from Near East tribes around the Black Sea.  Everywhere Pontic mariners spread they brought grain, cattle and exploitation of hinterlands.  The hinterland tribes of Europe were for raiding and slaving, although the sea-armies could be brought to truce.  Truce involved paying sea-armies tribute, providing stipendiary provisions, and allowing them have their own rule of law in their urban cantons and in port and mining commonwealths.  If that sounds familiar it is probably because the pattern repeats for a thousand years of English history in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.

Why Dacian?  Daci is the tribal name used for the warriors of King Cnut and King Harold in most original sources.  The original accounts of the Norman Conquest say that King Harold came to battle with Duke William accompanied by many mercenaries and auxiliaries who were Daci or gens Dacorum.  Until Christianisation created Danes and Denmark, the region around the Danish Hellespont was called Dacia and the people of the region were called Daci - just like their Bronze Age forebearers in Illyrian Dacia on the Black Sea.  Illyrian Daci were also acknowledged to be excellent mariners and warriors.  

Because we don't have really good names for these Bronze Age sea-armies, and every nation has named them something different thinking that they were indigenous tribes, I call the pattern of sea-army raids, truces and cantons 'Pontic Imperium'.  Pontic reflects Black Sea origins (Pontus was the Greek name for the Black Sea), sea-army control of straits and pounds for navigation (Hellespont means 'strait-pound' in ancient Greek), and a monopoly on transport by ship within the limits of their pound.  Once you look for it you find the pattern clear in many ancient texts.  Hellene would be really sensible as well, but Hellenic imperium would be confused with the Hellenic Empire, which arose much later, after the fall of Troy.  It probably isn't a coincidence that the Fall of Troy and the Iron Age are at about the same time.  With iron weapons the tribes of the hinterlands could fight back!

So why was Hastingas Dacian or Pontic?  Because whoever held the cape of Hastingas and the port in the Brede Basin controlled shipping in the strait between the south of England and the continent.  And because Snorri Sturluson said so.  He names the place of the battle of Hastings in the Saga of Harald Hardrata as Helsingia-portHels means strait in Old Norse just as helles means strait in ancient Greek.  Other Pontic cantons on straits in the Baltic are Helsinki and (H)Elsinor.

Still not convinced King Harold was a Dacian?  I can offer visual proof.  Look at the wolf-skin standard at the side of King Harold when he dies in Scene 57 of the Bayeux Tapestry side by side with the image of a wolf-skin standard of the Dacians defeated by the Emperor Trajan in the early 2nd century on Trajan's column in Rome.  Notice anything?  From the gaping jaws to tufted ears to the neck ruff to the curling tail, they are the same.  King Harold (a Danish name) came to battle at Hastings bearing a Dacian wolf-skin battle standard!

So now I am not just re-writing the history of the Norman Conquest, but also suggesting a much more complicated Dacians v. Romans backstory between King Harold and Duke William for control of English ports, straits and trade. Enjoy!

Friday, 14 October 2016

950th Anniversary of the Battle of Hastings - Why is Battle Abbey at Battle?

Ever since I first started writing a revisionist geography and history of the Battle of Hastings I have been asked the same questions.  Where was the battle?  If it wasn't at Battle then why is Battle Abbey there?

No one can answer the first question.  We don't know where the battle was because all that 100 years and more of archaeology have found is a single axe head three miles from Battle and a single skeleton of a 10th century violent death victim almost 20 miles away.  The axe could have been lost by a woodsman eaten by wolves.  The victim of violent death could have died a thousand different ways any time in that violent century.

All we can know for sure is that the nearest fortification to the battle was Hastingecaestre (not to be confused with modern Hastings which didn't exist in 1066).  The Normans had a naming convention that named battles for the nearest castle or  fortifcation, as Shakespeare reminds us in Henry V when the king names the battlefield for the nearby fortress of Agincourt.  Wherever the battle was, the nearest fortification was at Hastingacaestre.

Today I mark the 950th anniversary of the Norman Conquest by answering the second question of why Battle Abbey is at Battle.  I finally know why Battle Abbey was sited where it was and it is a really, really good reason.  Medieval minsters were sited along the coast so that they could be viewed by mariners coming into port.  The mariners could then give thanks for their successful voyage by visiting the minster and making offerings.  Battle Abbey was built on the promontory that  dominated the view of the mariners on ships entering the Brede Basin between Winchelsea and Rye at the ostium of the great estuarine port owned by Fecamp Abbey where the Normans had landed their fleet in 1066 and camped their army while waiting for King Harold, his Anglo-Danish earls and thanes, his Danish mercenaries and whatever Saxons may have followed him.

The breakthrough came at the 2016 Battle Conference, where we were housed in the Battle School within the Abbey's grounds.  The accommodation was basic (3 to a room and shared bathrooms on the landing) but my view was priceless.  From my first story window I could see the wind turbines turning on Camber Sands.  That gave me the idea that the abbey - which had stood just east of my window - could also see down the great Brede Basin to Camber Sands between Winchelsea and Rye.  Fortunately for me English Heritage had just opened up the roof of the Gateway Tower to the public, so I could run up the tower and check the view to be certain.  My heart pounded all the way up, and not from the stairs.  Sure enough, from the tower you can see all the way down the length of the Udimore Ridge to the ostium of the great medieval port between Rye and Winchelsea.

I jumped in my car and drove to Icklesham, which is where I believe the Normans had their camp.  I raced down the footpath into the flat bottom of the now pastoral valley.  Sure enough, from the bottom of the valley you can see Battle hill clearly against the horizon at the top of the valley.  There is a gap in the great ridge above Hastings that reveals Battle to the port.  Had I been on the deck of ship entering on a rising tide I could not have offered a more heartfelt prayer of thanks.

I raced around the valley to Udimore in the slanting afternoon sun in time to assure myself that Battle could also be seen from a tower or high window at Udimore where Court Manor had stood in the days of William the Conqueror.

Below is the photographic proof.  Battle Abbey was sited at Battle because it could be seen from the port, and also from King William's royal manor at Udimore.

It feels really good to have figured this out after all this time.  I went down to the Brede Basin again a few weeks ago with the Winchelsea Archaeological Society and we all walked out to the middle of the basin for the view.  Everyone who was with me was just as excited as I was.  We now have an answer for why is Battle Abbey at Battle: so it could be seen by Norman mariners and warriors and settlers as they came into the great port that had hosted the conquering fleet and army.

Happy 950th anniversary!  More to come as I continue my researches.

Monday, 14 September 2015

Mapping History

Perhaps it is because I am a cartographer's daughter or one of the last students taught by that wonderful geographer George Kish, but I love maps and always learn something from studying maps.  Last weekend I was chatting to a former university vice-chancellor at the Angel Canal Festival and he said that he always felt that historians should use more maps.  Whenever he listened to their presentations he found himself wishing they had started their talk with a map.

Maps help people navigate the past, just as they help us navigate the present.  Geography is intimately connected with history, influencing economic circumstances, culture, customs, legal principles and political evolution.  Ground conditions, climate, violent weather, catastrophes such as earthquakes, floods and volcanoes, all influence history.  Visually presenting a geography and/or a topography for an historical period helps the viewer/listener/reader orient themselves and mentally accept the conditions in which history was enacted.

I am now launching into my MA in Medieval History at King's College London.  I think it will need maps, but I suspect that maps are alien to the culture of historians.  This worries me.

Working my way through the reading list, I am finding very few maps.  I've just finished John H. Arnold's History: A Very Short Introduction.  It is excellent in its overview of the scope, methods and objectives of history, but it never once mentions maps and only rarely mentions geography.

In frustration I went down to the library and found George Kish's A Source Book in Geography and read it cover to cover.  What I wanted from the book was actually on the first page of the Introduction, but I read the rest of the book for fun.  George Kish was a fun professor and gives a lively account of the history of geography from the earliest sources to the modern era.

The quote I wanted is as follows:

Quum oceanus movetur, totus movetur. 
- Bernardus Varenius, Geographie Generalis (1650) 

'When the ocean is moving, everything is moving.'  That is going to be the tagline of my dissertation, which will likely be on the implications of coastal geomorphology on the continent and in Britain for early migrations, settlement, conflicts and conquests in England.  I'm going to have maps, because maps will correct the errors of perception of the past 500 years faster than any amount of historiography.

Kish translates Polycarp Leyser in Commentario de vera geographiae methodo (Helmstedt, 1726):
He who wishes to read the works of historians, or desires to hold forth in the proper manner about history, must know all disciplines, arts and sciences.  Yet there are certain disciplines which are of such a nature that they relate more closely to history than others:  chronology, archaeology, the study of coinage, and geography.

Geography, which I list in last place, surpasses all the others both in dignity and excellence.  For it assists in a wonderful way the study of history, making it easier to remember historical events when relying on geography. 

I would even add that geography is the touchstone of both history and historians, which reveals the errors of historians with ease.
I plan to reveal 500+ years of misguided interpretation of history and toponomy as historians neglected to study geography and geomorphic change.  Geography can drive history, as famine, flooding, fire, storms and catastrophes drive migration, settlement, conflict and conquest.

Monday, 24 August 2015

History needs to be more than the written and oral record these days

Few of us would choose to consult an 1840s doctor for a physical complaint, no matter how well regarded by his peers.  Phrenology and blood letting have been superseded by modern medical diagnostics and pharmaceutical treatments.  Historians routinely cite Victorians as authority, however, only rarely questioning their assumptions and evaluating their biases.

Historians are bound by the fetters of the past to a degree unknown in other research disciplines.  Few medical researchers even bother citing 20th century texts and articles as the pace of medical discovery has rendered most of the research of the 20th century already archaic.  It was valuable in advancing science at the time, but further scientific advance is no longer tied to that body of work.

I think something like that must happen to the study of history soon.  Digital humanities is making a dent by introducing better tools to structure, study and compare complex historical data.  As that progresses, many of the assumptions of the past will be shown to be inaccurate.

This is already happening with our understanding of Romans and Vikings.  Viking itself is a made up word popularised by Victorians as a catch-all for the barbarian raiders of the migration age.  They were depicted as uncivilised, tribal, infidels whose only interest was the theft of booty and women from the civilised, Christian kingdoms of Europe.  Science is now showing most of the Victorian history of Vikings was inaccurate, or at least incomplete.

Similar revolutions in historical thinking are underway regarding Roman history.  There were very, very few Italo-Romans relative to the size and population of the Roman Empire, yet Victorian historians liked to think that Britannia as a province was ruled by Rome - ignoring all the middlemen as ignorant auxiliaries following orders from Rome.  Science is showing a different picture as the complexity of military organisation gets supplemented by a better understanding of provincial civil and financial administration.

I started my career as an historian three years ago when I ordered digital images of the only manuscript of the earliest account of the Norman Conquest from the Royal Library in Brussels.  Transcribing and translating the ancient Latin script brought the Norman Conquest to life for me.  While translating I began to question the story I had learned in grade school, but the words were not enough to explain where the Normans sailed to, camped and fought the Anglo-Danish rulers of England.

It was images of geomorphology in East Sussex that revealed the great port in the Brede Basin where ancient Peueinsel and Hastingas can be found, a port known to the Romans and Belgian Gallic tribes as Novus Portus.  It was name frequency data which demonstrated that Godwin and Harold were Anglo-Danes, not the great and noble Saxons that Edward Bulwer Lytton depicted in Harold, the last of the Saxon kings.  Academics still cite the histories of Augustin Theirry and Edward A. Freeman, historians who popularised the study of British history in the Victorian era, but we should supplement what they wrote with much better science and analysis today.

Despite 500+ years of thinking we knew the Normans landed at Pevensey and Hastings, we were wrong.  We forgot that the barons of Peuenisel and Hastingas had been forced to move to the coast by inning and shingle shift which closed their ancient port to the sea.  We ignored King John's 1207 charter for a new town to the barons of Peuenisel, and ignored the navigation guide of 1170 that says the port of Hastingas was at Winchelse.

I could cite the thousands of misguided historians beginning in Elizabethan times who wrote that the Normans landed at Pevensey and Hastings, but life is too short and my time is too valuable.  Why should I bother citing and refuting everyone who has ever made the same mistake by repeating each other's misguided conception?  I would rather write and depict the accurate geography of the Norman navigation, landing, encampment and battle, reconciling modern geomorphic science with the original texts in Latin, and then move on to the next mystery offered by history.

Manuscript digitisation, coin databases, DNA databases, charter databases, name databases, archaeology and geomorphology are showing us a picture of the past which will change our understanding of trading, raiding, conquest and settlement.  It's an exciting time to become an historian.

Thursday, 16 July 2015

Ala Chocha in 1086 was Cock Marling, Udimore, East Sussex

A place named Ala Chocha is recorded in a notification of plea of William the Conqueror in 1086 as a manor of William of Eu.  There is no place with this name in any other English or Norman record.

In February I correctly identified Ala Chocha as a manor on the Udimore ridge, but the etymology wasn't entirely satisfactory, so I have kept looking.   Last weekend I realised the relevance of the Rye Camber salt pans after visiting Maldon on Saturday and reading every reference to salt in Anglo-Saxon charters on Sunday.  Now I can confirm that Cock Marling comes from Coquenaria Marliensis - the salt pans of marling.

The Brede Basin was an industrial powerhouse and strategic asset 929 years ago.  William the Conqueror and his entourage would have looked from the manor at Ala Chocha across the Channel to Normandy, overlooked the harbour where ships moored in the port of Winchelsea, viewed south to the markets of Old Hastingas across the ford at low tide, viewed north to the London road from Appledore.  The Brede Basin hosted ship building, iron mining, potteries, bloomeries, forges and saltworks.  The site presented an ideal spot for a prestigious manor for a warrior with the stature of William d'Eu.

Ala Chocha was named for the the greatest coastal saltworks in all of Britain: the 100 salt pans attributed to Rye in the Domesday Book and probably the additional untaxed salt pans of Rameslege nearby.  Fecamp Abbey's Rameslege domain is mostly omitted in Domesday records as free of the king's taxes, but the settlements at Rye and Novus Portus are both detailed.  1,195 salt pans - salinae - are mentioned in Domesday Book, but 100 is the most in any one place.  The next nearest in production is Maldon with 45 salt pans.  Cheshire has its -wiches with varying levels of production.  (Virtually all -wich names were associated with salt production.)  The rest were only of local importance.

Salt was the original money, traded for centuries before coinage was minted.  Roman soldiers were paid in salt, hence the word soldier is one who works for salt, and a salary is a regular entitlement to salt.  Salt was really good money: portable, negotiable, storable, stable, essential.  Having started my career as a central banker, I find a monetary basis for the name Ala Chocha elegant and satisfying.

Three Anglo-Saxon charters use near cognates of Chocha in reference to salt cookers.  In 785 King Offa uses coquendam sal.  In 863  King Aethelberht of Wessex and Kent uses the term salis coquinariam.  In 938 King Aethelstan gives land at Taunton with coquindam salisChocha and coquinaria are pretty close cognates, and much more satisfactory as an explanation for the Norman name.  Ala Chocha simply means 'Wing of Salt Cookers' and the ridge from Udimore (Eu de mare means the manor of Eu by the sea) through Cock Marling leads straight to the then enisled market town of Rye at the tip of the wing.  The map in the banner illustrates the shape of a wing nicely.

Rome insisted on imperial control of large-scale salt production, and early kings took royal control and taxation of salt production when they took power.  Salt was historically subject to heavy tax, usually equal to the sale price.  The tax and price could be sustainted as salt was essential to food preservation, industrial processes and urbanisation.  Fish, meat, cheese and vegetables can only be preserved effectively with salt.  Leather must be cured with salt.  Dyes need salt to work their colour into fabrics and leather.   

The Anglo-Saxon references support coquinaria as the basis for Chocha and later Cock.  The Brede Basin had the woods for cooking the salt, the iron ore to make metal salt pans (which wore out fairly quickly), markets and fishing fleets for ready sale of the salt, and mints for exchanging salt into gold and silver for payments to the king and church.  Geographically the Udimore ridge had the right slope to fill sandy salt pools at spring high tides, and concentrate the pools with successive inflows and evaporation to saturate the sands.  The Romans and then the Normans would have brought superior industrialised processes and technologies with them in developing the Brede Basin to make it highly efficient and productive as an industrial and commercial centre.

It is a phase in manufacture of salt that gives us Marling.  The salty sands from salt pools on the tidal flats were carried in baskets to salt works above the pools where the salt was rinsed from the saturated sands with fresh water.  The sand was allowed to settle and the brine was drawn off for cooking.  Other impurities were precipitated from the brine solution using a variety of methods, such as adding egg whites to create a froth that captured impurities.  That frothy mix was - and still is - called marl for the fine clay that often adulterates salt brine.  Then the brine is boiled away to leave the pure salt.  In Latin or Romanz (the Norman language) the genitive plural would be marliensis.  The descriptive name was Anglicised like most -iensis place names to an -ing ending in English.  The name Cock Marling is therefore a modern expression of coquenaria marliensis - the salt pans of Marling.

The Udimore ridge, Guestling ridge and Iham (now Winchelsea) had plentiful fresh water.  Rye didn't have much fresh water according to records of the medieval town, so Rye probably made its salt at Cock Marling on the ridge that leads to Rye, also closer to the forests of the Anderida Weald.  The Udimore ridge would be preferred for salt-making because it was south facing, so received more direct sunlight to promote evaporation of the brine pools below the ridge.  In the steep valley the brine pools were also sheltered from winds in the Channel.

The many bloomeries along the ridge for making charcoal for iron forges probably served the dual purpose of evenly evaporating salt brine.  Charcoal-making requires steady, moderate heat - like salt pans.  Charcoal requires huge supplies of oak, supplied by the forest of Anderida Weald, convenient for ship building in the Brede Basin.  The Anglo-Saxon charters for coquenaria also grant rights to wood from forests with the grants of salinae.  Charcoal was essential to the steel forges that made ship chandlery, tools and weapons in the Brede Basin, but charcoal does not transport well so needs to be produced locally, close to forges.  The four industries of timber, iron works, salt production and ship-building were all locally synergistic, and all important to the projection of royal power.

The manor of Count d'Eu was "above the salt" - literally and figuratively - if it was located at Udimore near the church built by Fecamp Abbey.  Udimore is just west along the ridge and a bit higher than Cock Marling.  The name itself can be derived as Eu-de-mer: Eu's manor at the sea.


According to "Rother Country", page 108, which is written by local historian Bob Chantler:

Court Lodge seems to have been an important residence from an early time.  It was visited by both King Edward I, who reigned 1272 until 1307, and by his grandson Edward III, whose queen, Phillippa of Hainault, watched the Battle of Les Espagnols sur Mer in the English Channel from the manor estate.  Later on August 15th 1479, a royal license to crenellate was granted, and Court Lodge became a fortified manor house.
The detail about watching a sea battle on 29th August 1350 (also known as the Battle of Winchelsea) from the house seems to support its excellent defensive position monitoring both the estuarine port and the Channel crossing to Normandy.  Bob includes some pictures of the moat and Channel view, if you follow the link.

The 13c Court Lodge was moved in 1912 to Groombridge, but may have been built on an earlier Romano-Gallic-Norman foundation at Udimore.  I've been told by locals that there are deep slag foundations at buildings and farms above the valley that may indicate early Romano-Gallic buildings for the port infrastructure and industrialisation, pre-dating Fecamp Abbey possession from 1017, or even Saint-Denis possession from 875 (perhaps further evidence for the genuineness of the Saint-Denis charters).  This is one of the things I will continue to investigate.

Court Manor gardens are open to the public during the summer, so I may visit next time I'm down in Sussex.

If I am right about this identification, it also supports the name Senlac - sandy loch - as applying to Brede Basin.  We know from modern geologic core samples that the basin was covered in deep marine sand, but sand's essential relevance to salt processing is confirmatory.  With massive industrialised salt works the sands of the valley would have gleamed white below the English battle line on the ridge facing the Norman camp in October 1066.  Sandy Loch would be an obvious name for hinterland Saxons to give the great, prosperous estuarine port.

It also makes sense that Anglo-Danes Godwin and Harold would have contested control of such an important and profitable industrial basin held by Anglo-Normans.  Godwin may have tried to take Bredta, the manor holding the Udimore ridge, early on when he gained his earldom, while Cnut was king.  Fecamp Abbey won an undated confirmatory charter from King Cnut for the manor of Bretda as being properly part of its possession named Rameslege.  The charter also grants 2/3 of the portoria tolls at Winchelse to the abbey, with presumably 1/3 for King Cnut.  That charter was confirmed later by Harthacnut as king.

When the weaker Saxon-Norman Edward the Confessor was king, the Anglo-Dane Godwin once again coveted the great and profitable saltworks.  After 45 years of Danish rule in England, Edward the Confessor was surrounded by Danish earls.  The hauscarls (paid soldiers) and butsecarls (shipmen) were Danes or Anglo-Danes, and the Saxons had grown accustomed to Danish rule.  The Norman-bred king had little real power to contest against Anglo-Danish violence. 

Godwin and his sons violently seized the Brede Basin from Fecamp Abbey in 1052 during the rebellion while they were outlawed, killing, enslaving or exiling the Anglo-Norman population of the basin.  Abbot John sought return of the abbey's possessions in 1054 after Godwin died, but Harold refused as successor to his father's earldom.  1066 was payback, with King Harold losing the Brede Basin and the kingdom to Duke William.  By 1086 the salt industry in the Brede Basin was clearly in full swing again.  The naming of the manor Ala Chocha gives further confirmation of the importance of salt to medieval prosperity.

Thursday, 4 June 2015

I become an Historian

The die is cast.  I'm now an historian.  I've been accepted to do an MA in Medieval History at King's College London, happily the finest university for medievalists.  Now in my 50s, I choose to voluntarily sit exams in Latin again.

The main motivations for doing a further degree (I already have a bachelor of arts and a juris doctorate) are to gain credibility as a translator and historian and acquire the methodologies of modern historians.  No matter how inspired, accurate or disciplined my past efforts, the lack of a degree in history from an English university impairs acceptance of my translations of the Carmen of 1066 and other medieval works.  I'm proud of the transcription and translation I've produced as an 'independent scholar', but without an academic affiliation the resulting book is denied credibility among serious academics and the discoveries expressed in the introduction to the book will not draw further academic enquiry as they deserve.  Credibility demands a university affiliation and adoption of conventional methods of publication and citation.

I also want to be able to provide my evidence as a database, searchable by geography or the many different place names in Old English, Saxon, Danish, Frankish, Romanz or Latin, which requires more skills and technologies than I currently possess.  A year from now, with luck and determination, I'll have a degree, more resources and a new skill set, as well as an extended network for collaboration and review of my further works.

After accepting the place at KCL my next acts were to register with my new affiliation for the International Medieval Congress in Leeds and the Battle Conference in Cambridge.  While I won't be presenting papers this year, I will be learning a lot, mixing with other historians, and broadening my conception of historical disciplines beyond my own interests.  The tag of 'independent scholar' that I wore at earlier conferences meant that I was kept at a distance by the academic historians and regarded as suspect at best, nutcase at worst.  With a KCL name badge, I may not be embraced, but I won't be warily repelled either.

Academic affiliation also means I have access to more and better resources, and at reduced cost.  As an independent scholar I often had to pay for access to records, even public records, at commercial rates.  With a KCL affiliation the rates are reduced, and in some cases waived.  I've been wanting the ancient (pre-1300) archaeological records for the Brede Valley for some time, but was put off by the cost.  Now I can have them as academic research.

I will have classes in Latin, materials and methods, philology, and, of course, history.  They will be hard work, but it's exciting to be facing new challenges.  I hope it will also prove fun.

My most significant work during the MA is likely to be a re-evaluation of the four Anglo-Saxon charters in favour of Saint-Denis of Paris.  Believed to be forgeries by most modern English scholars, I think they might be genuine and might make a significant contribution to understanding the connections between Briton and Angle royals during the Merovingian era when what is now England was a set of rival kingdoms subjected to a long period of contested rule before the Saxons triumphed.  Saint-Denis clerics administered early markets, trade and taxation at ports, cantons and customs posts throughout the Merovingian empire.  These institutions were about the only way to raise gold and silver as portable wealth, and gold and silver were the means to raise armies.  Inviting Saint-Denis to administer ports in London and Sussex would have strengthened cross-channel commerce and encouraged skilled emigration from Paris and Gaul.  Trade would mean more money for Briton and Angle kings and more and better-armed Gallic mercenaries to fight the encroaching Saxons.

The earliest Saint-Denis charters are during the 8th century reign of King Offa, who was married to a kinswoman of Charlemagne and fancied himself as imperial too.  I blogged about his charter for port strand at Londonwick and Portus Hastingas et Peuenisel back in 2013.  King Offa introduced religious, monetary, commercial and legal reforms to England on the Frankish models, and clerics of Saint-Denis may well have played a key role in reforming and administering these institutions to commercialise England.  During Offa's long reign England not only exported wool but also finished cloth and even manufactures.  Charlemagne wrote Offa a letter to ask that the next shipment of cloaks be made longer in keeping with the Paris fashions.  Offa may even have been the model of the king depicted as King Arthur in Wace's 11th century Roman de Bru, a king who similarly tried to bring unity, Christian principles and enlightened governance to early England.

Wish me luck.

And yeah, I did get "The dye is cast" wrong initially.  I of all people should know to always go back to the Latin original!  The Latin phrase is iacta alea est meaning a singular die or game piece is thrown.  Still being schooled . . .

Wednesday, 22 April 2015

Tidal ports and tidal bores - explaining the loss of Caesar's ships and the rise of Old Hastingaport

News of the surging Severn bore coinciding with the total lunar eclipse in March may have solved a nagging mystery and helped me to prove that Julius Caesar and William the Conqueror both used the same ancient estuarine port to invade England.  As the linked story explains:

This amazing footage shows brave surfers tackling the River Severn 'super tide'.
It is a special natural phenomenon known as a tidal bore, where high tides create an impressive surge wave.

The Severn's impressive tidal range, the second highest in the world at up to 50ft, combined with its estuary shape creates the ideal conditions for the bore to form.
Water is funnelled into an increasingly narrow channel as the ride rises, and as it travels up the estuary is channelled into an ever-decreasing area, causing the huge waves.
. . .
The bore, one of eight in the UK and around 60 worldwide, was once measured at a height of 9.25ft in October 1966.

Railway engineer Steve King set a world record for riding the bore in 2006 when he surfed the wave for over seven miles for 1 hour and 17 minutes.

As a tidal bore surges up a narrowing estuarine channel, it creates a larger, more powerful surge wave against the river's current.  Tidal bores are especially powerful at times of unusually high tides, e.g., at or following the full moon coinciding with the spring or fall seasonal high tides.  Tidal bores are magnified when the channel is near a strait that concentrates tidal force or when the tide is further swelled by wind and storm surge.

It hit me reading about the Severn Bore that the ancient Brede Valley below the Strait of Dover might have had a powerful tidal bore meeting all the above criteria when it was open to the sea, 2000 and 1000 years ago.
  •  It was a tidal estuary that narrowed for its length from the mouth between Rye and Winchelsea to its tidal limit at Sedlescombe;
  • The prevailing winds from the southeast would direct tidal flow toward the mouth of the port;
  • The placement of the valley below the Strait of Dover (even narrower 2000 years ago) would concentrate the effect of a flooding tide, creating a more powerful surge into the port;
  • The tidal range of up to 6 metres on the coast would be powerfully magnified into the narrowing estuary;
  • The surge wave would flood the flat plain at the southwestern end of the valley.

And the descriptions of the port from ancient texts may support the identification.

Who can we think of from history who was surprised by the violence of tidal surges in the British port where he had believed his ships secure?  Well, Julius Caesar leaps to mind for one.  He lost his ships to the violence of surge in the port where they anchored in 55 BC on his initial invasion of Britain and again, despite precautions, in 54 BC when he returned to Britain.  His description of the port where his forces landed has never been satisfactorily reconciled with the known coast of Britain. From Elizabethan times the port has been assumed to be Deal or Sandwich.  However, the words Caesar uses to describe the geography of his landing are utterly inconsistent with that part of the coast.

Caesar describes the port in his Commentaries on the Gallic Wars (IV:23) as extending seven miles beyond his overnight mooring and bordered by montibus angustis - narrow heights.  I've bolded the geographic details that describe the port.

[24] Cuius loci haec erat natura atque ita montibus angustis mare continebatur, uti ex locis superioribus in litus telum adigi posset.  Hunc ad egrediendum nequaquam idoneum locum arbitratus, dum reliquae naves eo convenirent ad horam nonam in ancoris expectavit.  Interim legatis tribunisque militum convocatis et quae ex Voluseno cognovisset et quae fieri vellet ostendit; monuitque, ut rei militaris ratio, maximeque ut maritimae res postularent, ut, cum celerem atque instabilem motum haberent, ad nutum et ad tempus omnes res ab iis administrarentur.  His dimissis et ventum et aestum uno tempore nactus secundum dato signo et sublatis ancoris circiter milia passuum septem ab eo loco progressus, aperto ac plano litore naves constituit.

Montibus angustis explcitly means high hills narrowing from a base in proportion to height, and so by inference precipitous.  This description makes no sense applied to Deal and Sandwich, neither of which have any cliffs or heights, and doesn't make sense either applied to Dover, where the cliffs are precipitous but bluff.  The description is a perfect match, however, for the steep sandstone ridges to the north and south of the Brede Valley - now the Udimore Ridge from Sedlescombe to Rye and the Icklesham Ridge from Guestling to Winchelsea.  These would have been much higher and steeper 2000 years ago.  It has been suggested that the phrase mare continebatur could be interpreted as describing a port 'hemmed in by cliffs', and that too is a perfect description of the estuarine Brede Valley.  It is unlikely to have been a sensible description of ancient Dover, Deal or Sandwich.

Ex locis superioribus in litus telum adigi posset means that from the heights the defending Britons could cast spears to the shore.  There are no heights at Deal or Sandwich nearer than Dover.  From Dover defenders could cast spears to the shore, but otherwise the description doesn't apply as the port at Dover lacked an offshore mooring like the one Caesar describes and wasn't seven miles deep - milia passuum septem.

While the ships are moored offshore awaiting break of day and a change of tide (as ships would be off the Rye Camber for another 1500 years), Caesar brings all the military commanders to his ship to be briefed by Volusenus on what he has learned.  The next phrase has been variously construed because it contains some difficult conjunctions and passive verbs.  If understood as the words of Volusenus, it might mean:  "He warned that as a rule of military affairs, and especially naval affairs demanded, on a nod they could be taken by a sudden and unstable motion, and all things according to the conditions must be managed by them."  This seems like he might have been warning them that the ships would be siezed by the incoming tide and carried suddenly into the port on an unpredictable flood, so that they must be ready to manage whatever occurred next.

Then too, Caesar lands the fleet aperto ac plano litore - on a flat and open shore.  The heavy transport vessels must beach where the water is waist deep, so that the soldiers have to jump into the water and wade to shore in their heavy armour, carrying spears and swords above them, vulnerable to the almost naked defenders with their spears on the shore.  The Morini-affiliated tribe that lived in the port and other British defenders and the Romans then fight a battle in 55 BC in a place suitable for the use of chariots by the Britons - meaning a broad plain.  That cannot be Dover!  The description is perfect for the broad landing at the end of the Brede Valley near Westfield, where Roman roads would later have a crossroad and likely an ancient market. 

Full moons 'at the end of summer' (the nearest Caesar gives for a time) in 55BC could be August 31 at 6:00am or September 29 at 16:47.  Caesar waited until the end of summer to take advantage of the the much higher seasonal tides approaching the autumn equinox, reducing the journey time and making it more likely his heavily laden ships would reach Britian sailing on a single tide with the prevailing southerly wind.  Even so, his horse transports do not successfully cross in 55 BC, having departed from a port below the one from which his two legions launched (probably Etaples, though customarily understood to be Bologne or Wissant).

[29]  Eadem nocte accidit ut esset luna plena, qui dies a maritimos aestus maximos in Oceano efficere consuevit, nostrisque id erat incognitum.  Ita uno tempore et longas naves, [quibus Caesar exercitum transportandum curaverat,] quas Caesar in aridum subduxerat, aestus complebat, et onerarias, quae ad ancoras erant deligatae, tempestas adflictabat, neque ulla nostris facultas aut administrandi aut auxiliandi dabatur.  Compluribus navibus fractis, reliquae cum essent funibus, ancoris reliquisque armamentis amissis ad navigandum inutiles, magna, id quod necesse erat accidere, totius exercitus perturbatio facta est.  Neque enim naves erant aliae quibus reportari possent, et omnia deerant quae ad reficiendas naves erant usui, et, quod omnibus constabat hiemari in Gallia oportere, frumentum in his locis in hiemem provisum non erat. 
It is unthinkable that lunar high tides were unknown to Caesar and his naval pilots.  It is easily imaginable, however, that they did not anticipate a tidal bore that strengthened to a mighty surge as the valley narrowed toward the place where they had anchored their heavy transports and pulled the longboats on the strand.

Even though he took greater care he again suffered damage to his fleet, both large anchored ships and smaller beached boats, in 54 BC when storm surge overtook the fleet.  40 of the ships are lost, and the rest of the fleet of 600+ ships sustains heavy damage requiring a long period for repair.  Caesar has the ships brought ashore and secured in a defended camp.

This description pf the storm surge is again consistent with a tidal bore gaining intensity up a narrowing estuarine channel.

As an estuary that narrowed from its mouth between Rye and Winchelsea to its furthest reach at Sedlescombe, the ancient Brede Valley would naturally be prone to tidal bores.

Source: M. Waller, P.J. Burrin and A. Marlow,  Flandrian Sedimentation and Palaeoenvironments in Pett Level, the Brede and Lower Rother Valleys and Walland Marsh (1998).
A powerful tidal bore in the estuary would also explain the loss of Old Hastings and/or Old Winchelsea in the 13th century.  According to Willaim Camden, writing in Britannia in the 16th century, in the first-ever topographical survey of Britain: “The tradition is that the old towne of Hastings is swallowed up by the sea."  He also expressed scepticism that Hastings where it now stands was ever a significant port, so possibly different to Hastingeport or Hastingacastre of the old texts.  He points out "The haven, such as it is, being feede but with a poore small rill, is at the south end of the towne.” Back in medieval times, tidal ports were always located on estuarine channels, never exposed positions on the coast.  Camden also commented on the need to labouriously winch fishing boats up from the shore at Hastings in his day, again making it ineligible as a trade port for valuable heavy cargoes like wine, spirits, dyes and oil from the continent.

The Carmen too is explicit about geography for the Norman Conquest.  The fleet lands on a 'peaceful arc of strand' - laeta sinu placido (line 128).   It describes cliffs above a broad valley into which the ships discharge their armies, where the sole surviving Englishman hiding sub rupe marina - under a cliff by the sea - observes the slaughter of the 'tribe of treason' before riding off to warn the king (lines 149 - 155) .  

Both Caesar's Commentaries for 55 BC and the Carmen for 1066 describe the navigations as crossing the Channel in the autumn, on a southerly wind by night on a single tide, waiting for the fleet to join up, mooring offshore within sight of land until morning, entering the port on a flowing tide, and landing their fleets on a calm, level arc of strand.  Caesar's fleet advances 7 miles into the port; the Normans advance three hours from 'leaving the sea behind' (lines 123 - 124).  In Caesar's day the coast was defended by tribesmen affiliated with the tribes Caesar sought to subdue across the Channel, then settled with Belgian-Gallic tribes loyal to him, but in 1066 the coast was undefended (line 127).  The Belgian-Gallic settlers' descendents and Anglo-Normans had all been slain or enslaved or joined the rebels in 1052 when the outlawed and exiled Godwin and Harold rebelled against King Edward the Confessor.  In 1066 King Harold had taken the fleet and any coastal guard of his retainers to fight the northern invaders led by King Harald Hardrata of Norway and his brother Tostig Godwinson.

The Norman fleet landed in the Brede River estuary in 1066, the army of more than 10,000 warriors and auxiliaries created a fortified camp there, and that camp - swelled by emigration in the years that followed - became the Novus Burgus of Domesday Book in 1085 - a city for which there was never any royal charter because its initial founding was as a temporary military base.  According to line 597 of the Carmen, the Normans of 1066 called that place Hastinge portus castris - camp at the port of Hastings - which would be Anglicised to either Hastingaport or Hastingacaestre.  Old Hastings was probably lost to the sea in the roaring storm surge of the 13th century, a replay of the violent tidal bores that destroyed Caesar's fleets.  We know the same storms destroyed Old Winchelsea and eventually displaced the shingle on the coast and closed the great port to the sea.  We have regarded the Brede Valley as pastoral ever since. 

The more I learn, the more convinced I become that the Brede Valley holds the secrets to the conquests of Britain by the Romans, the Saxons, the Danes and the Normans.